1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 962 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2890 mm |
