1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 123 kg more than 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Monte Carlo | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 315 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1603 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2720 mm |