1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 265 kg more than 2010 Renault Megane.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Megane |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |
