1986 Chrysler Conquest vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Conquest is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (198 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Conquest. (185 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Conquest.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Conquest. (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Conquest | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Conquest | Comet |
Year Released | 1986 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4738 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 382 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2950 mm |