1986 Chrysler Conquest vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler Conquest (185 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Ford Taurus. (154 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Conquest should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 152 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Conquest.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Conquest (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Taurus. (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler Conquest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Conquest | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Conquest | Taurus |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1477 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3030 mm |