1986 Chrysler Conquest vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler Conquest (185 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Conquest should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 310 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Conquest.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Conquest. (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Conquest | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | Conquest | BLS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |