1986 Chrysler Conquest vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler Conquest (185 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Conquest should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 5 weights approximately 253 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Conquest.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Conquest (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 5. (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler Conquest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Conquest | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Conquest | 5 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1753 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2751 mm |