1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Daytona is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Daytona | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | Chrysler | Hudson |
| Model | Daytona | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2210 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 243 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
