1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Daytona | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Daytona | Falcon |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
Torque | 243 Nm | 357 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |