1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Daytona (243 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 1986 Chrysler Daytona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger. 2002 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1986 Chrysler Daytona has manual transmission. 1986 Chrysler Daytona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Daytona | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Daytona | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 243 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |