1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 2003 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (530 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chrysler Daytona 2003 Ford Mustang
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Daytona Mustang
Year Released 1986 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2210 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 400 HP
Torque 243 Nm 530 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]