1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 2,210 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Daytona (243 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 1986 Chrysler Daytona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chrysler Daytona 2005 Mazda RX-8
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model Daytona RX-8
Year Released 1986 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2210 cc 1307 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 0 HP 228 HP
Torque 243 Nm 211 Nm
Top Speed 177 km/hour 235 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]