1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 2005 Porsche 996

To start off, 2005 Porsche 996 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 3,589 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Porsche 996 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2005 Porsche 996 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Porsche 996. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Porsche 996 (400 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 2005 Porsche 996 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chrysler Daytona 2005 Porsche 996
Make Chrysler Porsche
Model Daytona 996
Year Released 1986 2005
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2210 cc 3589 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Horse Power 0 HP 315 HP
Torque 243 Nm 400 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]