1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (325 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Daytona | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Daytona | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 243 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |