1986 Chrysler Daytona vs. 2011 BMW 125

To start off, 2011 BMW 125 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW 125 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2011 BMW 125 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 BMW 125. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 125 (271 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 2011 BMW 125 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chrysler Daytona 2011 BMW 125
Make Chrysler BMW
Model Daytona 125
Year Released 1986 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2210 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 215 HP
Torque 243 Nm 271 Nm
Top Speed 177 km/hour 238 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]