1986 Chrysler ES vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1986 Chrysler ES is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | ES | XK |
Year Released | 1986 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2600 mm |