1986 Chrysler ES vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1986 Chrysler ES is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot T 26 (198 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Talbot |
| Model | ES | T 26 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
