1986 Chrysler ES vs. 1959 Ford Anglia
To start off, 1986 Chrysler ES is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1959 Ford Anglia. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Anglia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 438 kg more than 1959 Ford Anglia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford Anglia. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 1959 Ford Anglia | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | ES | Anglia |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 75 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 737 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2310 mm |
