1986 Chrysler ES vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1986 Chrysler ES is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 961 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Because 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | ES | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |