1986 Chrysler ES vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 239 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |