1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Citroen C2
To start off, 2000 Citroen C2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (93 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C2. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 155 kg more than 2000 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2000 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | ES | C2 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2470 mm |