1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 33 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | ES | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |
