1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 626. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 626 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |