1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 469 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | ES | Aurora |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2900 mm |