1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Condor. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 271 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Because 2001 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | ES | Condor |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1446 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2670 mm |
