1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (73 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 20 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 2 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2500 mm |