1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2003 Daewoo Matiz

To start off, 2003 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler ES (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 397 kg more than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chrysler ES 2003 Daewoo Matiz
Make Chrysler Daewoo
Model ES Matiz
Year Released 1986 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2500 cc 796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 51 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 183 Nm 69 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1175 kg 778 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 3500 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2350 mm