1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 115 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | ES | Clio |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |
