1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2004 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2004 Dodge Durango is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Durango (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Durango weights approximately 944 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Durango (319 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 2004 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | ES | Durango |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 2119 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |
