1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 345 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 84.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |