1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 155 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (146 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Chrysler ES 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Chrysler Mitsubishi
Model ES Colt
Year Released 1986 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2500 cc 1493 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 100 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 183 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 75.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 104 mm 84.8 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1175 kg 1020 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 3880 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2510 mm