1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler ES weights approximately 220 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 6 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |