1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. Both 1986 Chrysler ES and 2009 Mazda BT-50 are equipped with a 2,500 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 691 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | ES | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1866 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3010 mm |
