1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (113 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2639 mm |