1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2011 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2011 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Because 2011 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 2011 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | ES | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
