1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2639 mm |