1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | F-250 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3967 mm |