1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (291 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (406 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler ES | 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | ES | Lancer |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 406 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4496 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2649 mm |