1986 Chrysler ES vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler ES. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 709 kg more than 1986 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler ES. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler ES | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | ES | XJ |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1884 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5127 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3032 mm |
