1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 1985 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Laser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Volkswagen Polo (116 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 415 kg more than 1985 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Volkswagen Polo. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 1985 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
| Model | Laser | Polo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2340 mm |
