1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 138 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1986 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Laser | Elan |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 160 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 997 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2260 mm |
