1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Laser | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
