1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Laser | 200 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |