1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 1998 Rover 200
To start off, 1998 Rover 200 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 60 kg more than 1998 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 1998 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Laser | 200 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |