1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2000 Audi TT
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 145 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 2000 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | Laser | TT |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2430 mm |