1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 475 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Laser | Celica |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2440 mm |