1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2003 Marcos TS500
To start off, 2003 Marcos TS500 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Marcos TS500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Marcos TS500 (321 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Marcos TS500 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Marcos TS500.
Because 2003 Marcos TS500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Marcos TS500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Marcos TS500 (475 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm). This means 2003 Marcos TS500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 2003 Marcos TS500 | |
Make | Chrysler | Marcos |
Model | Laser | TS500 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 321 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 475 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2300 mm |