1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2003 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2003 Samsung SM3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2003 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1986 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 2003 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Samsung |
| Model | Laser | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |
