1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 371 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Chrysler Laser | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Laser | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |
