1986 Chrysler Laser vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 292 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Chrysler Laser | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Laser | S60 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1427 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |